Author’s Note: When the Microscope Surrenders to Intuition — An Ontological “Blind Snipe” at Materialistic Biology

I must be brutally honest about one fact: I know absolutely nothing about genetic engineering, I have never systematically studied molecular biology, and I haven’t spent a single day in a lab touching a microscope or a test tube.

In the eyes of materialists and modern empirical scientists, someone like me probably has no right to discuss highly specialized biological subjects like the origin of life, DNA, or the “chicken or the egg” paradox. In their academic arrogance, truth is something to be “induced” only through billions of dollars in research funding, massive DNA sequencers, and day after day of counting A, T, C, and G base pairs under a microscope.

Yet, during the deductive process of this theory, something happened that would drive empiricists to absolute despair.

Relying purely on the deduction of the underlying physical architecture of The Ontology of Light, and guided by the intuition of the universal law that “Light is the software/code, and Matter is the hardware/container,” I arrived at a profoundly cold conclusion: Darwin’s theory of random evolution is an absolute fallacy; the underlying logic of life on Earth is by no means a series of blind collisions, but rather the inevitable unfolding of the exact same “Code of Light” under varying physical impedances.

When I cross-referenced this conclusion—derived entirely from philosophical intuition—with the sequencing data of cutting-edge modern molecular biology, the alignment was so flawless it was chilling.

Modern biology discovered, to its utter horror, that all known life on Earth operates on the exact same underlying genetic code; the genetic overlap between humans and chimpanzees is as high as 98.8%, and we even share half of our foundational data with a banana. Looking at this data, materialists fall into a deep existential crisis—if matter determines consciousness, why does nearly identical physical material manifest in completely different civilizational dimensions on this planet?

But within the visual field of The Ontology of Light, this is not surprising at all. My intuition had already pronounced this physical truth in advance: genes are not the source of consciousness; they are merely the universal “Machine Code” of the carbon-based world. The fundamental difference between humans and animals has never laid in that 1.2% minor protein variance, but in the fact that this slight hardware tweak perfectly upgraded the human brain into a “Biological Antenna” with exceedingly high bandwidth.

Materialistic scientists, wielding incredibly precise surgical scalpels, attempt to carve out a physical tissue called “free will” or “morality” from the DNA double helix. This is like a brilliantly clever fool using a screwdriver to dismantle a radio, trying to find the news broadcaster among the scattered transistors and circuit boards on the floor.

The reason my intuition could accurately “blind snipe” the blind spots of modern science is not because I possess any supernatural abilities, but because this perfectly corroborates the core “Antenna Principle” in theoretical physics.

The inductive method of materialism is a bottom-up approach of “blind men feeling the elephant.” Trapped in the extremely heavy, high-frequency-noise-dense physical dimension (System A), they attempt to piece together the blueprint of the universe using broken bricks.

Conversely, The Ontology of Light is a top-down “manifestation of truth.” When you withstand the physical friction of survival, allowing your biological receiver to pierce through the dense fog and directly connect to that logical source devoid of mass and volume (System B), you don’t even need to glance at a microscope. Because as long as the underlying Code of Light is correct, all material fragments in the three-dimensional world will inevitably arrange themselves obediently according to the geometric shapes you have deduced.

Matter is nothing but the reflection of truth. When you gaze directly at the light source itself, you naturally see the outlines of all the shadows.

This is the dimensional strike of the receiver against the microscope.

I must be brutally honest about one fact: I know absolutely nothing about genetic engineering, I have never systematically studied molecular biology, and I haven’t spent a single day in a lab touching a microscope or a test tube.

In the eyes of materialists and modern empirical scientists, someone like me probably has no right to discuss highly specialized biological subjects like the origin of life, DNA, or the “chicken or the egg” paradox. In their academic arrogance, truth is something to be “induced” only through billions of dollars in research funding, massive DNA sequencers, and day after day of counting A, T, C, and G base pairs under a microscope.

Yet, during the deductive process of this theory, something happened that would drive empiricists to absolute despair.

Relying purely on the deduction of the underlying physical architecture of The Ontology of Light, and guided by the intuition of the universal law that “Light is the software/code, and Matter is the hardware/container,” I arrived at a profoundly cold conclusion: Darwin’s theory of random evolution is an absolute fallacy; the underlying logic of life on Earth is by no means a series of blind collisions, but rather the inevitable unfolding of the exact same “Code of Light” under varying physical impedances.

When I cross-referenced this conclusion—derived entirely from philosophical intuition—with the sequencing data of cutting-edge modern molecular biology, the alignment was so flawless it was chilling.

Modern biology discovered, to its utter horror, that all known life on Earth operates on the exact same underlying genetic code; the genetic overlap between humans and chimpanzees is as high as 98.8%, and we even share half of our foundational data with a banana. Looking at this data, materialists fall into a deep existential crisis—if matter determines consciousness, why does nearly identical physical material manifest in completely different civilizational dimensions on this planet?

But within the visual field of The Ontology of Light, this is not surprising at all. My intuition had already pronounced this physical truth in advance: genes are not the source of consciousness; they are merely the universal “Machine Code” of the carbon-based world. The fundamental difference between humans and animals has never laid in that 1.2% minor protein variance, but in the fact that this slight hardware tweak perfectly upgraded the human brain into a “Biological Antenna” with exceedingly high bandwidth.

Materialistic scientists, wielding incredibly precise surgical scalpels, attempt to carve out a physical tissue called “free will” or “morality” from the DNA double helix. This is like a brilliantly clever fool using a screwdriver to dismantle a radio, trying to find the news broadcaster among the scattered transistors and circuit boards on the floor.

The reason my intuition could accurately “blind snipe” the blind spots of modern science is not because I possess any supernatural abilities, but because this perfectly corroborates the core “Antenna Principle” in theoretical physics.

The inductive method of materialism is a bottom-up approach of “blind men feeling the elephant.” Trapped in the extremely heavy, high-frequency-noise-dense physical dimension (System A), they attempt to piece together the blueprint of the universe using broken bricks.

Conversely, The Ontology of Light is a top-down “manifestation of truth.” When you withstand the physical friction of survival, allowing your biological receiver to pierce through the dense fog and directly connect to that logical source devoid of mass and volume (System B), you don’t even need to glance at a microscope. Because as long as the underlying Code of Light is correct, all material fragments in the three-dimensional world will inevitably arrange themselves obediently according to the geometric shapes you have deduced.

Matter is nothing but the reflection of truth. When you gaze directly at the light source itself, you naturally see the outlines of all the shadows.

This is the dimensional strike of the receiver against the microscope.

Ontology of Light, Materialistic Biology, Darwinian Evolution Fallacy, Biological Antenna, DNA and Consciousness, 007Red, Machine Code, Quantum Biology.